No
more excuses: Poor hires can sink a company so HR should be diligent
about conducting thorough background checks
For the last decade
or so, there’s been a newspaper article floating around
the recruitment industry. For anyone in HR, it is one story worth
noting.
It states that more
than 95 per cent of college students surveyed said they would
make at least one false statement to get a job. And 41 per cent
said they’d already done so. It’s hard to know how
many kids would falsify an entire resume to get a foot in the
door, but one shudders to think.
But it’s not
just college kids. Company executives, final job candidates, current
employees — anyone who’s looking for work or a promotion
— are all willing to claim, and hide, the most incredible
things.
Mind you, some of the
stories are a little more silly than incredible.
Take the recent case
of a job candidate an employer was particularly enamored with.
The candidate didn’t actually possess the university degree
he claimed, and when the company that did the background checking
told the employer, the employer was enraged. The employer had
received a copy of the diploma and was certain the report from
the background checker was flawed.
But the university
was able to confirm the job applicant had actually cut and pasted
the diploma together (which is in itself a bit laughable because
applicants lying about their education normally do so by purchasing
the master’s degrees of their choice online.)
These lies are no laughing
matter when it comes to a company’s bottom line. Estimates
have put the cost of turnover as high as two or three times an
employee’s annual salary.
Without proper background
checks, not only is there a risk in hiring unqualified people
but criminal or ethical concerns can go undetected.
In the United States,
the Department of Commerce estimates that 30 per cent of business
failures are due to poor hiring practices. This claim seems reasonable
when one looks at the staggering number of workplace violence
incidents, the high jury awards for negligent hiring in the U.S.
and how much money is lost to employee fraud.
According to the Retail
Council of Canada, internal theft accounts for 48 per cent of
retail losses — more than $1 billion annually.
More than one-third
of applicants lie
These numbers can spell
big trouble for Canadian employers. A recent internal study conducted
by my firm, Infocheck, indicated that 35 per cent of final job
applicants had something that raised a red flag during a background
check — and those are applicants who have already made it
through multiple rounds of interviews.
Some of the red flags
raised:
•7.5 per cent
had criminal records;
•25 per cent
were classified as poor performers by their references;
•27 per cent
fabricated their educational credentials;
•40 per cent
had areas of concern with their driver records;
•nine per cent
were involved in theft or fraud;
•27 per cent
had poor credit histories; and
•19 per cent
were fired from their previous employers.
Also, fake letters
of reference and personal references for hire are now widely available
and easily found on the Internet.
With the importance
of conducting background checks firmly established in many hiring
practices, some organizations are starting to perform annual criminal
checks on current employees.
This is often the result
of new, more stringent post Sept. 11 hiring practices, but it
can be an important step for any organization with employees who
never underwent a background check when they were hired.
Any organization can
benefit from a background check, whether it’s an individual
the organization has never met before or a senior executive who
has been in the company for a decade, conducting background checks
can reduce an organization’s legal bills, retraining costs
and expenditures related to hiring efforts.
Conducting a background
check certainly can put a bite on bad hires and there really aren’t
many valid excuses for not conducting one.
Source:
CHRR, Report on Recruitment & Staffing, May 23, 2005
Click
here to return to the E-zine and/or close this window
|